Connect to us on social media and join in the conversation
Agenda item
DETERMINATION OF PREMISES LICENCE APPLICATION - RHYMNEY GARAGE, VICTORIA ROAD, RHYMNEY, NP22 5NU
Minutes:
The Legal Advisor to the Sub Committee outlined the procedure for the meeting, including
the order of representations and the opportunities for all parties to ask
questions.
Mr Lee Morgan (Licensing Manager) presented
his report and outlined the application for a new premises licence at Rhymney Garage, Victoria Road, Rhymney.
Members were advised that the application initially sought to permit the
sale of alcohol via off sales, 24 hours a day, Monday to Sunday. The applicant subsequently amended his
application to reflect the sale of alcohol via off sales, between the hours of
05:00 until 02:00 Monday to Sunday. The
applicant had also volunteered a number of steps as part of the Operating Schedule
to promote the Licensing Objectives, which were set out in Section 1.3.1 of the
report.
During the 28-day consultation period, representations were received
from Trading Standards who advocated conditions in relation to the application. Representations were also received from the Gwent Police and Licensing Authority in their role as Responsible
Authority, and Gwent Police, who both raised objections in relation to the
extent of the hours applied for and suggested revised hours of 07:30 – 23:00
to be appropriate for a premise of this type in the Rhymney area. Further details were set out in Section 1.6 of the report. No representations were received from local
residents. The applicant’s response was
summarised in Section 1.7 of the report, with the applicant agreeing to the
conditions proposed by Trading Standards but indicated they did not agree with
the Gwent Police and Licensing Authority position in relation to the hours proposed by
them.
Attention was
drawn to the local policy considerations as set out in the report and to the
way in which the Sub-Committee would deal with the application. The Sub Committee were
referred to the recommendation set out in the Licensing Manager’s report, which
considered the position of the Responsible Authorities and recommended that the
application for a Premises Licence to permit the retail sale of alcohol be
granted between the hours of 07:30 to 23:00 Monday to Sunday, subject to the
conditions as set out at Appendix 8 of the report.
All parties
present were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of the Licensing Manager
and none were received.
Representations were then invited from the applicant, Rhymney Garage.
Mr Rajesh (Licensing Consultant) addressed the Sub
Committee on behalf of his client, Mr Piratheepan
(applicant). Mr Rajesh explained that
the premises would be run as a convenience store and not a wine shop, with his
client being a personal license holder with an excellent track record and
several years of experience in the licensing trade, and who already runs another
24-hour business nearby. He explained
that his client was fully aware of the expectations that will be placed on him
regarding licensing conditions and understood that these need to be complied
with.
Mr Rajesh summarised the history of the
application, explaining that his client initially applied for 24 hours and
accepted the conditions proposed by Trading Standards. Following a conversation with Gwent Police
and the Licensing Authority RA, the applicant reduced the terminal hour to
02:00 and also accepted the proposed conditions in full.
It was emphasised to the Sub Committee that the
applicant was willing to take additional measures to promote the Licensing
Objectives, including no single-can sales and all purchases to be made through
a serving hatch after 23:00 to control the sale of alcohol. The premises would keep a list of customers
causing problems and refuse future sales, and staff would be reminded of the
importance of preventing underage sales.
The applicant would also be willing to enrol in the local Neighbourhood
Watch Scheme. Mr Rajesh outlined the
willingness of the applicant to add these measures and emphasised that there
was no chance of the premises undermining the Licensing Objectives.
Mr Rajesh then referred to the existing
anti-social behaviour issues in Rhymney that were highlighted in the
Responsible Authority representations, and explained that in his view, this was a
decades-old problem driven by multiple factors.
He did not believe that the premises licence if granted would contribute
to these problems or undermine the Licensing Objectives, due to the strict
controls and standards that would be put in place by the applicant. He stated that there were no issues connected
to the premises when it was licensed under previous management.
Mr Rajesh
suggested that the crime statistics in Rhymney related to a number of factors,
not just alcohol, and cited the lack of evidence linking this to the existing
Rhymney Garage business. He reminded
Members that the Responsible Authorities objections were in relation to 24-hour
sales and the applicant had revised the terminal hour to 02:00, which was only
an extra three hours of trading compared to what the Responsible Authorities
had suggested. He also referred to the
mechanisms under the Licensing Act for a premises review to be brought to the
Sub Committee if needed. In closing, Mr
Rajesh highlighted the lack of objections from local residents and other
Responsible Authorities and asked for the application to be granted as applied
for.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions. In response to a
Member’s query, Mr Rajesh confirmed that there are other licensed premises in
the area and stated that his client was proposing a greater number of
conditions and measures compared to these other establishments. The Member also
asked why the applicant had applied for an alcohol licence for this particular
area of Rhymney. Mr Rajesh explained
that the premises had previously been licensed but the licence was surrendered
and then re-applied for. He explained that
his client had invested heavily in extra facilities to provide convenience to
its customers, and that people working early or late shifts might appreciate
the convenience of being able to buy alcohol at the same time as purchasing
groceries and petrol.
Mr Todd Rawson (Legal Advisor to the Sub
Committee) sought clarification on the no-single can policy. Mr Rajesh
explained that this was one of his client’s practices as he had another 24-hour
business not far away (in the Mountain Ash area) and that troublemakers were
more likely to purchase single cans, which was not good for business. Mr Rawson asked how the applicant intended to
obtain a list of troublemakers. Mr
Rajesh explained that this would be obtained through the police, Trading
Standards and the Pubwatch scheme, and the premises
would also keep a running list of difficult customers. Mr Rawson also asked about the night hatch
proposal and it was explained that customers would be served their groceries
through this hatch after 23:00.
A Member sought clarification on the opening hours
of the garage, the plans for trade after 23:00 and the procedure around serving
customers through the hatch. Mr Rajesh
explained that the business is open from 05:00 to 02:00. Hatch service starts at 23:00, with everything
served through the hatch, meaning that service is slower and more
controlled. He confirmed that a small
section of the shop would be allocated for the display of alcohol and there
would be a minimum of two staff on site.
Representations were then invited from Responsible
Authorities.
Ms Leah Wilson (Trading Standards Officer)
referred to the representation submitted by her colleague (Mr Tim Keohane) and confirmed that conditions had been advocated
to enhance the application, which had been accepted by the applicant. She added that Trading Standards supported
the representations made by Gwent Police and the Licensing Authority.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions. Mr Todd Rawson referenced
the support given to the Gwent Police representation and asked why these
concerns were not raised in the Trading Standards representation. Ms Wilson explained that this is because
these concerns are outside the remit of Trading Standards, as their
representation related to the Protection of Children from Harm Licensing
Objective.
Mr Rawson also asked if the proposals to prohibit
single-can sales had changed Trading Standards’ view on the application. Ms Wilson confirmed that the position of
Trading Standards remained the same as they were already satisfied with the
conditions proposed and agreed by the applicant. She also confirmed that standard conditions
had been applied due to this being an initial premises application and because
there was no evidence of issues at the premises to warrant enhanced conditions,
although these could be requested if required.
A Member asked if Trading Standards had been in
contact with other Responsible Authorities beforehand regarding the
application. Mrs Dicks (Assistant
Licensing Manager) confirmed that there had been no interaction with Trading
Standards.
Mr Rajesh stated that he had not been aware that
Trading Standards were supporting the representations of Gwent Police. However, he added that the applicant had
accepted the conditions proposed by Trading Standards and would also put other
measures in place to remind staff before every sale about underage sales.
Representations were then invited from Gwent
Police.
PC Dan Allen referred Members to the
representations from Gwent Police as set out in the agenda pack. He made reference to social economic factors
which highlighted Rhymney as being one of the most deprived areas in the UK,
which links to higher than average unemployment in the area, and which in turn
has led to increased anti-social behaviour (ASB) within the locality and created a
breeding ground for organised criminality.
Secondary crime, including violence with injury / public order and ASB
behaviour, are significantly higher than the force rate, contributing to residents
not feeling safe and heightened community tension.
PC Allen drew Members’ attention to the location
of the premises which is on the main street in Rhymney,
and explained that other off-licences in the area
close at 23:00. He referred to the high
levels of ASB in the town, with Rhymney regarded as
the second most dangerous small town in Gwent, and with a high number of
crimes. In a 6-month period, 215 calls
were made to Gwent Police specifically relating to Victoria Road
(where the garage is located), High Street and Church Street, with 56 of these
calls (28%) linked to ASB. Over a
3-month period (1st April-30th June 2021) 139 calls were received for the same
locations, with 28% of these calls again being for ASB.
PC Allen explained that these calls
range in their timings from early to late evening, to the early hours of the
morning and are commonly of large congregations of youths causing alarm and
distress, youths and vehicles congregating in car parks. The calls have become so evident to the
Victoria Road, High Street and surrounding area that a “Problem Orientated
Policing Plan” (or POP plan) has been created to combat the high volume of
calls made in the immediate area of the garage and its surrounding area. Further details of the POP plan were appended
to the Gwent Police representation.
Members were also referred to a statement contained in the
representation from the local Gwent Police Inspector, Lysha
Thompson, which described how she has been working closely with partners to
assist in the issues that contribute to the high number of calls in Rhymney and
how Gwent Police have recently achieved significant funding through the Home
Office Safer Streets initiative to further strengthen efforts in driving down
crime and disorder in Rhymney.
The Sub Committee were then introduced to Inspector Thompson
who gave an overview of her role. It was
noted that Inspector Thompson moved over into the Caerphilly North area in May
2021 with a clear remit from Chief Officers, the existing staff team and
elected Members regarding the need to tackle ongoing crime and disorder issues
in relation to Rhymney.
Inspector Thompson gave a detailed overview of the policing
challenges faced by Gwent Police in Rhymney and explained that 9 out of her 14
Community Support Officers are currently based in Rhymney, which is at the
detriment of other areas. She outlined
the increasing demands placed on Gwent Police arising from the issues in the
Rhymney area, with the area around Rhymney Garage in particular requiring the
largest number of resources. It was
explained that until Gwent Police can get on top of these issues, it would be
unfair to place additional pressures on resources by allowing an additional
licensed premises to trade into the night.
Inspector Thompson asked for acknowledgement of the policing statistics
and recognition of the drain on resources, particularly given the limited resources
and funding available to tackle these issues.
Inspector Thompson referred to the extended hours applied
for between 23:00 and 02:00 and appealed to the Sub Committee to strongly
review these hours and not grant until Gwent Police can achieve stability in
the area, particularly given that 23:00 to 02:00 is when officers are most in
demand. Inspector Thompson highlighted
the detailed work that is ongoing to tackle crime and disorder in the area and
break the cycle, and she asked the Sub Committee to keep the licence to a 23:00
terminal hour in order to help Gwent Police manage their resources. She added that the Community Support Officers
are only funded up to midnight, and so additional licensing hours past that
point would increase demand which Gwent Police would struggle to meet.
In closing, Inspector Thompson stated that she would support
the grant of the licence to 23:00 and asked the Sub Committee to maintain the
status quo in line with the closing time of other off-licences in the area.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity to ask
questions, and a Member asked how many of the calls cited in the statistics
from Gwent Police were alcohol related.
Inspector Thompson explained that these are broken down into crime and
antisocial behaviour, but it is not possible to break
these down any further. However, she
also urged caution around trying to establish a correlation between crime and
alcohol, as alcohol is not always the purely contributing factor to these
issues.
Mr Rajesh explained that he respected the views of Gwent
Police and the issues faced in the Rhymney area. However, he asked if the measures proposed by
the applicant could be seen as good practice and a way of setting the standard
for the responsible supply of alcohol. Inspector Thompson disagreed with this
suggestion, outlining the unpredictability of individuals when consuming
alcohol, and she explained that Gwent Police are trying to take preventative
measures to stabilise the area. She
emphasised that Gwent Police do not need anything that would exacerbate an
already concerning situation in Rhymney.
She acknowledged that the applicant could put good strong measures in
place, but this would not fully reduce the risk of alcohol contributing further
to the crime and ASB problems in the area.
Mr Rawson asked what the split of over and under-18s was in
relation to the statistics around ASB and the congregation of youths. PC Allen explained that Gwent Police held no
information in this regard but they held general concerns over proxy sales of
alcohol in connection with these congregations.
Queries were received around congregation numbers during and after
Covid-19 lockdown. PC Allen confirmed
that any gatherings breaching the exceeded number of people permitted under Covid regulations had been recorded against another
category and not ASB, and that the crime statistics did not include separate
reports of Covid breaches. He confirmed that ASB had significantly
increased since lockdown lifted and there had also been a significant increase
month-on-month.
Mr Rajesh asked PC Allen if any calls had been made to the
police in connection with alcohol when the premises was licensed under previous
management. He also highlighted the
proxy sale restrictions that were proposed in the application and had been
accepted by the Responsible Activities.
Inspector Thompson reiterated that it is both crime and ASB that is
alcohol-related and Gwent Police are trying to carry out education work across
the Rhymney area to break this cycle of behaviour. It was confirmed that the
statistics only go back to 1st January 2021 and so Gwent Police held
no data on the previous proprietor of the garage.
However, PC Allen highlighted that the previous premises stopped trading
at 19:00 Monday to Friday and only traded from 08:00 to 14:00 on Saturday on
Sunday, and therefore there was a huge disparity between the two premises. Inspector Thompson acknowledged that it would
be naïve for Gwent Police to look at that area alone and they are trying to
address the factors that spill out into other areas.
Representations were then invited from the
Licensing Authority as a Responsible Authority.
Mrs Annette Dicks (Assistant Licensing Manager) referred to her
representation and highlighted an error in that the representation should refer
to Paragraph 10.4 of the Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy (and not
Paragraph 7.4). She explained that in
her view, the applicant had not given proper consideration to the nature of the
application, and that they are required to satisfactorily address the Council’s
licensing policy when making an application.
Mrs Dicks explained that the applicant had not sought any
pre-application advice from the Responsible Authorities, and if they had done
so, Gwent Police would have alerted him to the current problems in the Rhymney
area.
Mrs Dicks explained that her representation did
not object outright to the application, but that the previous licence was for
lesser hours, and that the application in its current format was not in keeping
with the current issues and surrounding area.
The Licensing Authority supported the representations of Gwent Police
and would therefore advocate a lesser period as stated by the police. It was noted that the applicant had suggested
the modification of hours but this would still be a 21 hour operation of
alcohol sales.
Mrs Dicks drew Members’ attention to Paragraph 5.4
of the Council’s Licensing Policy which states that the applicant should very carefully
consider the hours they seek when devising their operating schedule, and
recommends they discuss such an application with the appropriate Responsible
Authorities, and should also have regard to the particular local
environment. The Licensing Authority is
also required to consider the potential for problems, which could arise from
24-hour licensing of this premises based on the information from Gwent
Police. Mrs Dicks also explained that
she would have expected a far more comprehensive operating schedule than what
was supplied in the application, which made no reference to the minimum number
of staff that would be on site or the night serving hatch that would be in
operation, and these particular factors had only emerged subsequent to the
application or through the course of the Licensing hearing that day.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions. A Member sought
clarification on whether Mrs Dicks had been made aware of the night serving
hatch before the meeting. Mrs Dicks
explained that she had held a conversation with the applicant’s agent where she
had outlined the reasons for her objections and explained that she was not
willing to withdraw them in light of the modified hours. There was no previous mention of the number
of staff that would be on the premises, and the operating schedule proposed ten
measures to promote the Licensing Objectives, but in Mrs Dicks’ view, they were
rather ambiguous, and more concise information could have been put into these
element of the application in accordance with the Council’s Licensing
Policy. This included a lack of
information given around staff training and referred to a Challenge 21 policy
rather than the Challenge 25 policy advocated by the Council. There was no mention around displaying
notices, staffing levels or reference to night-time controls in relation to
service after certain times. This had
only been brought up through discussions with the applicant’s agent and the
information submitted at the Licensing hearing.
Mr Rajesh stated some conditions had been added
during the consultation period and also explained that the Licensing Authority
had only alerted him of these issues on Day 24, which gave him very little time
to discuss the application further with his client in detail. In his view, the 28 consultation period was
not used effectively and he had been under the impression that the Licensing
Authority had been satisfied with the measures put in place. He explained that
many of the measures are already in place at the existing business and
therefore had not been included in the application in detail. However there were a raft of additional
measures that the premises was intending to put in place, and he asked Mrs
Dicks if she was satisfied with the operating schedule or if she would prefer
additional measures to be included.
Mrs Dicks explained that she would have expected
more comprehensive detail in the initial application given that the applicant
is an experienced licence holder. She
added that given the number of applications received by the Licensing
Authority, it would not be normal process for them to contact the applicant
towards the very start of the consultation period. Mrs Dicks explained that having consulted
with Gwent Police, many of her comments related to problems in the Rhymney
area, and she would have expected a far more comprehensive operating schedule
at the start of the process. Mrs Dicks
reiterated her concerns and stated that due to the problems in the area and the
potential for issues, her objections still stood regarding a 24-hour or 21-hour
operating period.
Mr Rajesh responded to a query around staffing
numbers and confirmed that there would be a minimum of two staff members on the
premises.
All parties were then afforded the opportunity to sum up before the
Licensing and Gambling Sub Committee retired to make its decision.
Mr Lee Morgan (Licensing Manager) asked Members to consider all the
information before them and to take into account all relevant licensing
guidance. He referred to the report
recommendation and reminded Members that the decision rested with the Sub
Committee.
Ms Leah Wilson (Trading Standards) confirmed that the applicant had
accepted the conditions proposed and she would welcome contact from the
applicant in relation to any advice or training needs as necessary.
PC Dan Allen
(Gwent Police) reiterated the problems around anti-social behaviour and crime
in the Rhymney area and emphasised that if a 21 hour licence were to be
granted, this would have a detrimental impact on people living in the area,
increase strain on police resources, and damage all the preventative
partnership work that has already been carried out.
Mrs Annette Dicks (Licensing Authority) referred to guidance issued
under Section 182 of the Licensing Act and the expectation around hours of
trade to be appropriate to the local environment. She reiterated her earlier concerns and
advocated a lesser period of licensable hours if the licence were to be
granted.
Mr Rajesh (Licensing Consultant) referred to his client’s significant
investment in the business and explained that Mr Piratheepan
would not jeopardise his livelihood by undermining the Licensing
Objectives. He referred to the lack of
direct evidence to prove that the premises will cause problems and reminded
Members of the numerous restrictions and controls that will be put in place at
the garage. Mr Rajesh emphasised that
the shop will be run to a high standard and he acknowledged the licensing tools
in place to bring forward a premises review if needed. In view of the measures that would be put in
place, Mr Rajesh felt that it would be unfair to refuse the application in its
current form based on perceptions alone, and he also referenced the lack of
objections from local residents or other Responsible Authorities.
The
Legal Advisor informed all parties present that the Sub Committee would retire
to consider the representations made at the meeting and they would be informed
in writing of the decision in the next 5 days.
The Sub Committee retired at 11.22 a.m. to make its decision and all
other parties left the meeting.
Following consideration of the application for a new premises licence at
Rhymney Garage, Victoria Road, Rhymney, and having regard to the Licensing Manager’s report and all the representations made, the
Licensing and Gambling Sub Committee unanimously
RESOLVED
that the application for a new premises licence be granted to allow the sale of alcohol
via off-sales from the premises between the hours of 07:30 hrs to 23:00 hrs, 7
days per week, and subject to the conditions set out in Appendix 8 of the
Licensing Manager’s report. For ease of
reference, the conditions are attached to these minutes.
In making their decision, the Sub Committee
considered all four Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Act 2003, revised Home
Office Guidance and Caerphilly Council’s Licensing
Policy.
The
Sub Committee accepted that Rhymney, at present, is experiencing issues
involving anti-social behaviour and crime.
The Sub-Committee gave weight to the representations from Gwent Police
about the additional measures it has had to put in place to reduce the
prevalence of the same. The
Sub-Committee accepted that there may not be historic issues with ASB or
criminal behaviour associated with the Premises, but further held into account
that the previous licence did have significantly different hours for the
off-sales of alcohol.
The
Sub-Committee gave significant weight to paragraph 5.4 and 5.7 of the CCBC
licensing policy in determining the application. They formed the view on the evidence before
them that to grant a license for the off-sales of alcohol for 21 hours every
day would not promote the licensing objectives, primarily the prevention of crime
and disorder, public safety, and the prevention of public nuisance. The Sub-Committee took into account the Home
Office National Guidance, particularly paragraph 9.12, and took into account
the expertise Gwent Police possess in assessing and dealing with crime and
disorder, and further potential for the same, within the Rhymney
community.
The
Sub-Committee were satisfied, given the nature of the licensed activity, that
the conditions contained within Appendix 8 of the report are sufficiently
clear, proportionate and targeted to promote the licensing objectives.
The
Sub-Committee took into account the personal experience of the applicant within
the off licence trade. However, in this
instance the extended availability of alcohol within this local community area,
given the current levels of crime and disorder, outweighed the same.
The decision notice advised that any person
aggrieved by the decision had the right to appeal to the local Magistrates
Court within 21 days from the date of written notification of the decision.
The meeting closed at 12.05 p.m.
APPENDIX
Conditions applicable to
the grant of the licence as per Appendix 8 of the Licensing Manager’s report :-
1. CCTV shall be
in use at the premises and shall cover the whole of both the inside and outside
areas of the premises. The video and
images captured by the CCTV shall be of a sufficient quality to enable the
facial recognition of all persons entering the premises. The CCTV shall be fully operational at all
times during which alcohol is available for sale from the premises.
The CCTV equipment
shall be maintained in good working order and the premises licence holder shall
ensure images from the CCTV are retained for a period of 30 days. This image retention period may be reviewed
as appropriate by the Licensing Authority.
The correct time and date will be generated onto both the recording and
the real time image screen.
If the CCTV
equipment (including any mobile units in use at the premises) breaks down, the
Premises Licence Holder shall ensure the designated premises supervisor (DPS),
or in his/her absence other responsible person, verbally informs the Licensing
Authority and the Police as soon as is reasonably practicable. This information shall be contemporaneously
recorded in the incident report register (referred to in condition 2 below) and
shall include the date and time this was done and the name of the individual to
whom the information was reported.
Equipment failures shall be repaired or replaced as soon as is
reasonably practicable and without undue delay.
The Licensing Authority and the Police shall be informed when faults are
rectified.
The premises
licence holder shall ensure that there are trained members of staff available
during licensable hours to be able to reproduce and download CCTV images onto a
suitable portable medium (e.g. DVD, SD card, memory stick) which shall be
provided to any authorised officer of the Licensing Authority or a constable
without delay upon request. There shall
be clear signage indicating that CCTV equipment is in use and recording at the
premises
2.The premises
licence holder shall require the DPS, or in his/her absence another responsible
person who shall be nominated by the DPS from time to time, to keep an
Incident/refusals logbook in a bound book in which full details of all
incidents are recorded. This shall include details of any refused sales and
shall give details of persons involved, incident description, time and date,
actions taken and final outcome of the situation. Such recording shall be
completed as soon as possible and in any case no later than the close of
business on the day of the incident. The time and date when the report was completed,
by whom, is to form part of the entry. The logbook is to be kept on the
premises at all times and shall be produced to an authorised officer of the
Licensing Authority or a constable when required. The records shall be kept for
a 12 month period.
3.The premises licence holder shall ensure that a sufficient number of
suitable waste bins are located in appropriate locations on the premises for
the depositing of waste materials such as food wrappings, drinks containers,
etc. by customers and shall further ensure that such receptacles are emptied
when full.
|
4.All sales of alcohol shall be processed through the EPOS terminal/s,
which shall give a till prompt to staff reminding them to verify the age of the
customer when alcohol is being purchased.
5.All spirit drinks shall be located behind the counter out of the reach
of customers and shall not be displayed for sale in any other part of the
premises. “Spirit drink” means any
alcoholic drink with an alcohol content greater than 15% ABV.
6.All staff/members who serve alcohol shall be
trained in the prevention of underage sales to a level commensurate with their
duties, including but not limited to the requirements of the ‘Challenge 25’
scheme set out in condition 7 below. All
such training shall be updated as necessary, for instance when legislation
changes, and should include training on how to deal with difficult customers
and customers who are intoxicated or under the influence of illicit substances. The training should be clearly documented and
signed and dated by both the trainer and the member of staff receiving it. The documentation shall be available for
inspection on request by an authorised officer of the Licensing Authority or a
constable.
7.The ‘Challenge 25’ Scheme, whereby an accepted form of photographic
identification shall be required to be produced by a customer appearing to be
under the age of 25 before any alcohol is sold to that customer, shall be
adopted and implemented.
Acceptable proof of age shall include identification bearing the
customer’s photograph, date of birth and integral holographic mark or security
measure. Suitable means of
identification would include PASS approved proof of age card, photo-card
driving licence and passport.
Publicity materials notifying customers of the operation of the
Challenge 25 scheme shall be displayed at the premises, including a Challenge
25 sign of at least A5 size at the entrance to the premises and where
practicable at each point of sale.
Supporting documents:
- Report- Rhymney Garage, item 3. PDF 344 KB
- Appendix 1, item 3. PDF 436 KB
- Appendix 2, item 3. PDF 269 KB
- Appendix 3, item 3. PDF 676 KB
- Appendix 4, item 3. PDF 388 KB
- Appendix 5, item 3. PDF 429 KB
- Atodiad 6, item 3. PDF 883 KB
- Atodiad 6a, item 3. PDF 543 KB
- Appendix 7, item 3. PDF 282 KB
- Appendix 7a, item 3. PDF 566 KB
- Appendix 8, item 3. PDF 113 KB