Connect to us on social media and join in the conversation
Licensing of Animal Boarding Establishments.
The Legal Advisor to the Sub Committee outlined the procedure for the meeting, including
the order of representations and the opportunities for all parties to ask
Mrs Sandra Lewis-Williams (Senior Licensing Officer) presented the
report and outlined the application submitted by Miss Angelique Thomas and Mrs
Jennie Thomas, trading as Springfield Boarding Kennels and Cattery, Penpedairheol Farm, Pontllanfraith for the renewal of an
Animal Boarding Establishment licence.
Upon application to renew its licence for 2022, the applicant submitted
a request for the Council to depart from the guidance for 3.3.4 of its adopted
conditions of licence for the purposes of Commercial Dog Boarding Kennels. Condition 3.3.4 specifically relates to the
provision of communal exercise areas within a commercial dog boarding
establishment, which states that “Communal facilities must not be used by more
than one dog at any one time unless they are from the same household”.
Mrs Lewis-Williams highlighted that Caerphilly Council licence 3
different types of animal boarding establishments, namely Commercial Boarding,
Commercial Day Boarding and Home Boarding.
Currently, Commercial Boarding is the one boarding type that does not
allow use of a communal facility by more than one dog unless from the same
The Sub Committee were advised that following advice from the Council’s
vet, and Officers carrying out an inspection at the premises, Licensing are of
the view that, subject to the 13 additional conditions being added to the
licence, the applicants will be able provide a safe and secure environment for
boarding dogs to take part in communal group exercise area. Members were therefore referred to the
recommendation set out in the Licensing Officer’s report, which recommended that subject to
confirmation of compliance with recommended conditions as suggested by the
council’s vet, the application for the licence to keep an
Animal Boarding Establishment and departure from condition 3.3.4 be approved.
All parties were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of
Licensing. Clarification was sought in
relation to feedback from other local authorities who run kennels in this
way. Mrs Lewis-Williams advised feedback
has been received and if kennels in other authorities are permitted to allow
communal exercise areas, they must be boarding at the kennels and must be
allocated their own kennels. The Legal
Advisor sought clarification on the degree of involvement from the vet in
making their recommendation, including if the vet undertook a site visit and if
he was aware of the exercise area dimensions being proposed. Mrs Lewis-Williams explained that the
proposals had been relayed to the vet, and whilst he had not carried out a site
inspection, all the necessary information had been provided to the vet, who
then suggested additional conditions that were included in the Licensing report.
Representations were then invited from the applicant, Miss Angelique
Thomas, who summarised her application and explained the reason she was seeking
removal of condition number 3.3.4 was to allow her business to provide a better
enrichment and socialisation experience for the dogs during their stay. She explained that over the past year she had
visited other establishments with this provision in place and observed that the
dogs were happier being able to interact more during their stay. She felt that if she could offer this freedom
during exercise times, it would be beneficial to the welfare of the dog during
parties were afforded the opportunity to ask questions, and Miss Thomas
responded to questions from the Sub Committee and the Legal Advisor. A Member sought clarification on procedures
the kennels has in place, for example if a dog became aggressive and attacked
Miss Thomas explained all dogs are invited to a meet and greet
session before their stay and background information is gathered from their
owner. The dogs are introduced on a
one-to-one basis before they are permitted to use the communal area, where a
temperament test is recorded along with any behaviour changes. It was explained that all staff are trained
to notice when a dog’s behaviour is likely to change and therefore should
increase the likelihood of this being noticed before an incident occurs. Members noted that the dogs are always
supervised when in the communal area and only taken out in small groups which
would be evaluated according to size, temperament and age. If an incident did occur the relevant
insurance is in place. A Member sought
clarification on how many dogs the applicant is licensed to board at one time
and Miss Thomas confirmed there were 36 kennels in total. However, the kennels are never run to full
capacity due to the applicant’s personal choice as they feel this is too many
to manage and look after at one time.
All parties were afforded the opportunity to sum up before the Taxi and
General Sub Committee retired to make its decision.
Mrs Lewis-Williams advised Members that the applicant’s proposed
business model is considered achievable and removing Condition 3.3.4 would
allow them to operate in this manner.
Subject to the proposed additional conditions attached to the report, it
is considered that the business could provide communal exercise for dogs in
their care whilst still maintaining the safety, security and welfare of dogs in
Miss Thomas stated that she could meet all the conditions imposed by
removing Condition 3.3.4 and felt that this would provide a better experience
for the dogs staying at her establishment.
The Sub Committee
retired at 10.30 a.m. to make its decision and reconvened at 10.58 a.m.
consideration of the application for the renewal of
an Animal Boarding Establishment Licence for Springfield Boarding Kennels and
Cattery, Penpedairheol Farm, Pontllanfraith
and having regard to the Licensing Officer’s report and all the representations
made, the Taxi and General Sub Committee unanimously
RESOLVED that the application for the renewal of an Animal Boarding
Establishment Licence be GRANTED as applied for with the removal of condition 3.3.4 of Caerphilly County Borough Council’s Conditions of
Licence for Commercial Dog Boarding Kennels (made pursuant to the Animal
Boarding Establishments Act 1963) and with the
recommended conditions as set out in Appendix 4 of the Licensing Officer’s
In reaching its decision, the Sub Committee gave
significant weight to the considerations made by the vet consulted by the
Licensing Officer in the course of the Applicant’s application and the careful
development of the proposed 13 conditions within Appendix 4. The Sub Committee were satisfied with the
Applicant’s experience within the industry to have confidence that the 13
additional conditions in terms of the mixed use of the communal exercise yard
will be complied with at all times. A
further significant factor held into account by the Sub Committee in reaching
their decision was the very large size of the proposed exercise yard to be
used, which gave the Sub Committee confidence that the same was likely to
mitigate a number of the usual risks associated with mixed dogs using the same
communal exercise yard at the same time.
Chair thanked all parties for their attendance and
the meeting closed at 11.02 a.m.
- Animal Boarding Report, item 3. PDF 223 KB
- Appendix 1, item 3. PDF 501 KB
- Appendix 2, item 3. PDF 325 KB
- Appendix 3a, item 3. PDF 186 KB
- Appendix 3b, item 3. PDF 767 KB
- Appendix 4, item 3. PDF 8 KB