Connect to us on social media and join in the conversation
Agenda item
Determination of Club Premises Certificate Variation Application - Pontymister Welfare Bowls Club, Ty Isaf Pavilion, Pontymister, Risca.
Minutes:
The Legal Advisor to the Sub Committee outlined the procedure for the meeting, including
the order of representations and the opportunities for all parties to ask
questions.
Mr Lee Morgan (Licensing Manager) presented his
report and outlined the application for the variation of the Club Premises
Certificate at Pontymister Welfare Bowls Club, Ty Isaf Pavilion, Pontymister, Risca.
Members were advised that the variation
application sought to remove the current embedded conditions, add the outside
bowling green adjacent to the pavilion for the consumption of alcohol as part
of the licensing area, extend the provision of alcohol hours to 23:30
Monday-Sunday and to 02:00 on New Year’s Eve, add the provision of live and
recorded music (Monday-Sunday 19:00 – 23:00 and 00:30 on New Year’s Eve), and
to vary the opening hours of the premises.
It was noted that the existing club premises certificate only covers the
pavilion building itself and not the bowling green, and so the variation if
granted would cover the bowling green area for the supply of alcohol.
During the 28-day consultation period, representations were received
from Gwent Police, the Licensing Authority in
their role as Responsible Authority, Environmental Health (Pollution Team), and
the Child Protection Officer, who all advocated conditions in relation to the
application as summarised in Section 1.6 of the report. Representations were also received from four
local residents in objection to the application with full details
appended to the Officer’s report. The
applicant had responded to the comments of the Responsible Authorities agreeing
to their proposals in relation to use of the outside area and limiting of
entertainment until 23:00. The applicant
had also responded to resident concerns in a letter as set out at Appendix 14
of the report.
It was noted that following the publication of the agenda papers,
supplementary information comprising of two photographs had been submitted by a
local resident (Mr Leonard) to support his objections and these had been
circulated to the Sub Committee in advance of the hearing.
Attention was
drawn to the local policy considerations as set out in the report and to the
way in which the Sub-Committee would deal with the application, together with
Section 1.9 of the report which provided clarification on the way the
application had been advertised, following comments received from residents. The
Licensing Department was satisfied that the applicant had met their legal
obligations in respect of advertising of the variation application.
The Sub Committee were referred to the
recommendation set out in the Licensing Manager’s report, which considered that any potential
conflicts with the promotion of the Licensing Objectives may be adequately
controlled by the recommended conditions
set out in Appendix 15 and as a result the variation application should
be approved.
All parties
present were afforded the opportunity to ask questions of the Licensing Manager. In response to a Member’s query on the
changes applied for, Mr Morgan confirmed that the existing club footprint is
limited to the pavilion building and the applicant sought to extend alcohol
supply to the confines of the bowling green.
The variation also sought to increase the sale of alcohol to 23:30 (currently
23:00) and to 02:00 on New Year’s Eve. Members
were asked to note that that the playing of live and recorded music at
licensed premises is deregulated between 08:00 to 23:00 under the Licensing Act
2003 in any case, and that although the applicant had originally requested an
extension to 00.30, they were content with the provision for music under
deregulation and no longer wished to apply for the additional 90 minutes. However they still wished to apply for the
playing of live and recorded music to 00:30 on New Year’s Day.
Mrs Coughlin (Local Resident) referred to the
extract of National Guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act
2003, and in highlighting Section 1.5 which encouraged greater
community involvement in licensing decisions, queried how this had been taken
into account, and also expressed concerns around the limited methods of
advertisement for the premises application.
Although a notice of application had been displayed on the gates of the
premises, Mrs Coughlin explained that she does not receive the local newspaper
and is not able to frequently check the Council’s website for such
notices.
Mr Morgan explained that the community have the
opportunity to participate in and influence licensing decisions by having an
input at Sub Committee hearings and informing Members of their concerns. Additionally, the legislation sets out how a
premises application must be advertised and Mr Morgan was satisfied that the
minimum advertising requirements under the Licensing Act 2003 had been complied
with.
Queries were received on whether the Licensing
Department or the Council could lawfully hold the applicant to a higher
advertising requirement. Mr Morgan
confirmed that Licensing cannot compel an applicant to go over and above the
minimum level, although it would be ideal for the applicant to take additional
measures of their own accord.
Furthermore, it would be a matter for the full Licensing Committee to
mandate additional advertising requirements should they be minded to do so.
Mr Morgan emphasised that all licensing
applications are communicated to the local ward members on a weekly basis,
providing the opportunity for these to be relayed to the community. In response to a Member’s query on
advertising requirements, Mr Morgan confirmed that legislation requires a
notice to be placed on the premises, in the local newspaper and for the local
authority to advertise on its website for 28 days, and he was satisfied these
requirements had been met for this application.
Mr Todd Rawson (Legal Advisor to the Sub
Committee) sought clarification on the practical difference in incorporating
the bowling green into the licence, as consumption of alcohol is not a
licensable activity. Mr Morgan confirmed
that consumption of alcohol within the bowling green would be a breach under
the current conditions of licence, and hence the applicant was seeking to widen
the consumption area.
Representations were then invited from the applicant, Pontymister Bowls Club.
Mr David Willing (applicant) addressed the Sub
Committee and responded to comments around the advertisement of the
application. He explained that the
notices were displayed within a day of making the application, were blue and in
a very large font, and were only taken down the previous week after the
consultation deadline had passed. They
were very visible on the gate for passers-by, and the club were confident the
advertising requirements had been complied with.
Mr Willing then outlined the reasons for the
application, explaining that patrons are currently unable to drink on the
bowling green itself, and that as the club had been unaware of the conditions
of licence, they were merely trying to rectify the unintentional breach that
had been occurring for a number of years.
The matter only came to light when Welsh Government allowed outdoor
consumption of alcohol as part of temporary Covid-19 provisions, and so the
club had been advised that they should apply for an outdoor licence to rectify
the situation moving forward. He also
explained that although the club had applied for the variation on a 7 days per week
basis, they only wished this for infrequent functions, such as club
presentations, which would only occur around 2-3 times a year. He added that the last time the club hosted
live music was in January 2020 to celebrate an 80th birthday party.
Mr Willing referred to residents’ fears that the
nature of the premises would significantly change if the variation was granted and
gave reassurances that this would not be the case. He confirmed that the club had agreed to the
proposed condition from Responsible Authorities to cease outdoor drinking at
22:00 and reiterated that even though live music was a deregulated activity to
23:00, this would only happen on around 2-3 occasions a year. He explained that club members would only
take alcohol out to the side of the building during matches, which finish
around 17:30 on Saturdays and around 20:30-20:45 in the week, before members
return to the building for food. Mr
Willing also outlined the layout of the pavilion and explained that the
pavilion windows are boarded up and do not face nearby houses. He also confirmed that the pavilion roof has
been reinsulated which will act as a sound barrier.
In closing, Mr Willing reiterated that the club
was not intended to alter anything that was not already happening at the
premises and emphasised that the bowls club was a respectable establishment
with a pre-dominantly over-70 membership and declining numbers.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions. Mr Leonard (local
resident) raised concerns around the unintentional breach of licence by the
club and the potential for loud music at the premises. Mr Willing reiterated that the variation had
been applied for in order to rectify the existing situation and for the club to
be run in accordance with the conditions of licence.
A Member asked if any resident complaints had been
received as a result of the outdoor activity and also asked if the current
limitations included the consumption of soft drinks. Mr Morgan confirmed that the consumption of
soft drinks is not a licensable activity and that he was not aware of any
complaints made to the Local Authority regarding the premises. He also added that any allegations in respect
of licensing compliance would be addressed appropriately.
In response to queries from the Legal Advisor, Mr
Willing gave an overview of club membership (34 active bowlers), the months of
usage (mid-April to mid-September), and the number of players at each game (32
bowlers in total).
Mrs Coughlin made further reference to the variation
advertisement and to parking issues in the area which she attributed to the
club. She asked why the club were
seeking a variation to 23:30 for outside areas and not 23:00 as per the
existing licence. Mr Willing confirmed
that the additional 30 minutes were mainly to accommodate private party
bookings for members. He also expanded
on the parking arrangements for members and visiting teams, explaining that
they are encouraged to park to the rear of the club where possible and not on
Springfield Road. It was noted that
parking is not a licensing matter.
Mr Morgan drew Members’ attention to an error in
Section 1.3.4 of the report and explained that if granted, the supply of
alcohol on a Sunday would cease at 23:00 and not 23:30. A Member asked if the provisions regarding
outdoor activity would revert to the original licence if not granted and it was
confirmed that this would be the case unless a Temporary Events Notice was
applied for. In response to a further
query, Mr Morgan also clarified the current relaxations in place regarding outdoor
hospitality as a result of Covid-19 regulations, which are expected to cease in
September.
Representations were then invited from Responsible
Authorities.
PC Dan Allen referred to the representation from
Gwent Police made by his colleague (PC Karina Williams). He confirmed that Gwent Police had no
objections to the premises variation and were satisfied with the conditions
that had been agreed by the applicant.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions. In response to
Members’ queries, PC Allen confirmed that Gwent Police had advocated that the
use of the outside area cease at 22:00, , and also that there had been no incidents where Gwent Police had been
called to attend the club. Mrs Coughlin
referred to Section 8.42 of National Guidance under Section 182 of the Licensing
Act where applicants should take into account factors such as proximity to areas where
children may congregate. PC Allen
confirmed that Gwent Police take into account the makeup of an area and this
would have been taken into consideration when examining the application.
Representations were then invited from the
Licensing Authority as a Responsible Authority.
Mrs Annette Dicks (Assistant Licensing Manager) referred to her
representation and confirmed that she had taken into account the nature of the
application and the existing club certificate held by the premises. The Licensing Authority had visited the premises
together with Environmental Health and noted the close proximity of the small
pavilion backing onto the residential area.
Therefore the Licensing Authority had recommended a number of
conditions, including outside activity ceasing at 22:00 and that recorded and
live music be restricted to 00:30 on New Year’s Eve.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions, and in response to queries, Mrs Dicks confirmed that no
complaints in relation to the premises had been received by the Licensing
Authority and that the maximum numbers allowed in the pavilion would depend on
the club’s fire risk assessment. It was
also clarified that the premises is currently able to host live music outside
to 23:00 under deregulation and would be able to continue with this even if the
variation was refused.
Representations were then invited from
Environmental Health Pollution Control. Miss
Abbie Brown (Environmental Health Officer) referred to her representation and
was of the view that recommended conditions as agreed with the applicant will
ensure that there is no adverse impact to residents, should the variation be
granted.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions and in response to queries, Mrs Brown confirmed that
Environmental Health had received no complaints regarding the premises and also
that there no restriction on music decibel levels. However, if a service request were to be
received, Environmental Health would undertake investigatory proceedings,
including an assessment of the sound volume at the complaint’s property. However the determination of whether a
decibel level is appropriate would be on a case by case basis and would depend
on the type of event being assessed.
Representations were then invited from Local
Residents (Other Persons).
Mrs Coughlin explained that her representation had
focused primarily on the process behind the application which had now been
clarified throughout the course of the hearing.
She stated that she did not object to outdoor alcohol consumption to
22:00 but she had noticed that windows inside the club would need to be open
after that time in order to take account of Covid-19 regulations around
ventilation. Mrs Coughlin confirmed that
she had never had any complaint about the bowling green activity and rather
enjoyed some of the events. However she
had concerns if licensable activity outside were to be extended to 23:30 as it
would take it to midnight by the time everyone dispersed. She referred to her concerns around parking
and also stated that Section 11.4 of the Council’s Licensing Policy prescribes
a need for consideration to be given to the impact of licensable activity on a
wider area.
Mrs Lane (Local Resident) was then invited to make
her representation. She explained that
her adult son suffers from mental health conditions requiring stability and was
concerned that the variation if granted would have an adverse impact on her
son’s wellbeing.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions of the two residents and the Legal Advisor asked Mrs Coughlin
how she had become aware of the variation application. Mrs Coughlin explained that her neighbour had
informed her. Mr Leonard added that
details of the variation had also been posted on a local Facebook page.
The Legal Advisor asked Mrs Lane a number of
questions regarding her son’s condition and associated routine to determine the
impact of the premises on his wellbeing.
Mrs Lane explained that unexplained disturbances can cause severe
distress to her son which require subsequent reassurance and that on a number
of occasions he had been significantly disturbed by noise from both within and
outside the premises.
Mr Leonard (Local Resident) was then invited to
make his representation. He explained
that he had no objection to alcohol in or around the premises, but his objection
was to live entertainment and the impact it could have on his autistic
daughter. Mr Leonard explained that he
had moved to the area to provide a peaceful environment for his daughter and
that she takes refuge outside when she becomes overwhelmed, where she has
specially adapted play equipment to assist in calming her. Mr Leonard explained that any external noise
has a significant impact on his daughter’s wellbeing and was concerned that all
the progress he had made in handling her condition would be in vain if the
variation were to be granted. He
expressed the seriousness of his daughter’s condition and felt that this needed
to be taken into consideration when determining the application.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions and a Member asked if live music could be permitted even if
the variation was not granted. Mr Morgan
confirmed that under deregulation measures, licensed premises are permitted
live and recorded entertainment between 08:00 to 23:00. However, he reminded residents of the
protection afforded to them under Environmental Health regulations in this
regard and emphasised that if the premises is causing noise nuisance, then this
needs to be communicated back to the relevant authorities by the residents, although
no complaints have been received by Licensing to date.
Members and the Legal Advisor asked Mr Leonard
several questions to determine the impact of the premises on his daughter’s
behaviour and wellbeing. Mr Leonard
confirmed that any instances of noise can cause his daughter to have an adverse
reaction, including other sources that are external to the activity around the
clubhouse and pavilion. Mr Leonard also
outlined the challenging behaviours and outbursts arising from his daughter’s
condition and explained that in more recent years, he and his wife and been
able to stave off episodes before they escalate and that his daughter’s “safe
space” tends to be in the garden. Mr
Rawson also asked if the noise from bowls matches tends to affect the child’s
behaviour. Mr Leonard confirmed that the
players are very quiet and his daughter does not tend to complain when they are
playing.
Mrs Waite (Local Resident) was then invited to
make her representation and it was confirmed that she had left the meeting owing
to another appointment but had asked Mrs Coughlin to speak on her behalf. Mrs Coughlin explained that Mrs Waite had
concerns over why she was not made aware of the variation in writing. It was also explained that Mrs Waite had a
young grandchild with a disturbed sleep pattern which would be impacted upon by
the variation. In her representation,
Mrs Waite raised concerns about anti-social behaviour in the area and also
highlighted parking issues in the area.
All parties present were afforded the opportunity
to ask questions and discussion took place regarding the parking concerns
raised by a number of residents.
Although it was acknowledged that this was not a licensing matter,
Members and Officers discussed the avenues available to residents to alleviate
the problem. Discussion also took place
between Mr Willing and Mrs Coughlin regarding a car barrier at lower
Springfield Road which is operated by the club.
All parties were then afforded the opportunity to sum up before the
Licensing and Gambling Sub Committee retired to make its decision.
Mr Lee Morgan (Licensing Manager) asked Members to determine the
application in accordance with the local policy considerations at Section 1.8 of his
report and in referring to the report recommendation, reminded Members that
they could consider other options if they so wished in view of the information
provided at the hearing.
PC Dan Allen
(Gwent Police) confirmed he had no objections and was satisfied with the conditions
agreed.
Mrs Annette Dicks (Licensing Authority) confirmed she had nothing
further to add and drew referred to the representations in her report.
Miss Abbie Brown (Environmental Health) confirmed that her
representations remained the same providing the conditions applied in the
report are adhered to going forward. She
emphasised that should there be any further concerns and service requests
received, there are provisions for Environmental Health to investigate and act
and call for a premises review if needed.
Mrs Coughlin confirmed that she was objecting to the extension to 23:30
but had no objections to the other aspects of the variation, subject to due
diligence being applied as set out in the conditions.
Mrs Lane asked the Sub Committee to take mental health into account when
reaching their decision.
Mr Leonard feared that his daughter’s wellbeing was not being taken into
account and could be jeopardised and was unhappy that there were no specialists
or child protection officers present at the meeting to present their views.
Mr Willing emphasised that nothing would change in the running of the
club if the variation were to be granted.
He reiterated that functions would only be held 2-3 times a year and
under the existing licence, were permitted to play music to 23:00 regardless. He acknowledged the concerns of Mr Leonard
regarding his daughter’s wellbeing but felt too much emphasis was being placed
on potential noise nuisance given that the club does not even open every day of
the week. He emphasised the infrequent
nature of club functions and that drinking rarely happens outdoors and stressed
that the club does not intend to change its operating style going forward.
The
Legal Advisor informed all parties present that the Sub Committee would retire
to consider the representations made at the meeting and they would be informed
in writing of the decision in the next 5 days.
The Sub Committee retired at 12.20 p.m. to make its decision and all
other parties left the meeting.
Following consideration of the application for the variation of a club
premises certificate for Pontymister Welfare Bowls
Club, Ty Isaf Pavilion, Pontymister,
Risca, and
having regard to the Licensing Manager’s report and all the
representations made, the Licensing and Gambling Sub Committee unanimously
RESOLVED
that the application for the variation of a club premises certificate as set
out in Section 1.3 of the Licensing Manager’s report be GRANTED, save for the
supply of alcohol being limited from 11.00am to 11.00pm (rather than from 11.00am
to 11.30pm) and subject to the
conditions set out in Appendix 15 of the report. For
ease of reference, these are attached to the minutes.
In making their decision, the Sub Committee
considered all four Licensing Objectives, the Licensing Act 2003, revised Home
Office Guidance and Caerphilly Council’s Licensing
Policy.
The
Sub Committee gave significant weight to the long history of the club premises
being run without any known complaint in regard to the conduct of its
licensable activities. It concluded that
this was to a degree probative of the likely manner in which the varied Club
Premises will be conducted. It held into
account that the club had a relatively small number of members and expected
guests, and is operated on a part time basis, limited namely to match days,
special occasion functions and small social groups during the off season. The Sub Committee took into account that some
of the residents indicated during the hearing that they no longer objected to
the club premises licence being extended to include the bowling green.
The
Sub Committee took into account the residents’ concerns regarding the potential
for public nuisance (via noise). It took
into account that by extending the club license to include the bowling green
then it would by default allow the deregulated activity of putting on live
music from 8am until 11pm within such area.
It gave consideration to the applicant’s evidence that this was not
their intention, and live music events have only been conducted in conjunction
with special functions, such as significant birthdays etc,
and have been held solely in the pavilion itself. It took into account the historically limited
number of such events each year, the applicant’s evidence that nothing in this
regard would alter, and the lack of any known complaint in relation to the
noise of such events in the past.
The
Sub Committee gave careful consideration to its Public Sector Equality Duty and
the disabilities of some of the neighbouring residents. In balancing its considerations between such
duty and the objectives of the Licensing Act 2003, the Sub Committee formed the
view that varying the supply of alcohol until 11.30pm would not be appropriate
in the circumstances. The Sub Committee
felt that such decision would uphold the four licensing objectives and also provide
a more appropriate cessation time taking into account the needs of the disabled
residents. In reaching this position the
Sub Committee took into account that each disabled resident was affected by
noise in general and there was only a limited link to the noise emanating from
the licensable activities within the Club Premises.
The
Sub Committee did not gave significant weight to the wider community issues of
vehicle parking (which would appear to be primarily based on the activity of
attending a bowling match rather than a licensable activity) and the alleged
insufficiency of the applicant providing Notice of the variation
application. It was satisfied on the
Licensing Manager’s evidence that the statutory notice requirements had been
correctly complied with and any wider complaint as to the sufficiency of the
same was beyond the remit of the Sub Committee and would rest with
parliament.
The decision notice advised that any person
aggrieved by the decision had the right to appeal to the local Magistrates
Court within 21 days from the date of written notification of the decision.
The meeting closed at 1.20 p.m.
APPENDIX
Conditions applicable to the grant of the licence
as per Appendix 15 of the Licensing Manager’s report and incorporating the
amendment in respect of the permitted hours for the supply of alcohol:-
Supply of alcohol (on and off the
premises)
Monday to Sunday 11.00am – 11.00pm.
New Year’s Eve 11.00am – 02.00am
Live & Recorded Music
Monday to Sunday 7.00pm – 11.00pm (N.B. this is not a licensable
activity whilst the premises are open for the sale of alcohol between 8am and
11pm
New Year’s Eve 11.00pm – 0.30am
1.
The use of the outdoor
area for the consumption of alcohol shall not take place after 2200hrs and the outdoor area shall be
used solely as a smoking area after this time. The smoking area shall not be
used by more than 5 persons at any one time post 22:00hrs.
2.
Adequate notices shall be displayed in appropriate
locations to ensure that the requirements of condition 1 above are brought to
the attention of patrons.
3.
Staff, committee members or other competent persons
shall manage ensure that the outdoor area is managed so that customers do not behave in a noisy,
rowdy or offensive manner, and shall further ensure that measures are put in
place to monitor the external areas for such behaviour on a regular basis.
4.
A clearly visible notice
will be placed on the premises advising those attending, that the Police will
be informed if anyone is found in possession of controlled substances or
weapons.
5.
Clear notices must be
displayed at all points where patrons leave the building instructing them to
respect the needs of local residents and leave the premises and the area
quietly.
6.
A risk assessment shall
be carried out of the need for polycarbonate or toughened glasses to be used on
the premises, especially for outdoor
events/use.
7.
A ‘Challenge 25’ policy
will be in place for checking persons suspected of being underage. No alcohol
shall be supplied to a person who appears to be under the age of 25 unless they
provide identification that proves that they are 18 years of age or older
before the alcohol is supplied. The only acceptable forms of identification for
proof of age shall be a passport, a photo card driving licence, an EU/EEA
national ID card or similar document, or an industry approved proof of age
identity card. The proof of age scheme will be robustly enforced by the Club
and all staff concerned in the sale of alcohol. Posters stating that the age
verification scheme is in operation shall be clearly displayed in at least A5
size at the entrance and where practicable at each point of sale.
8.
All refusals will be
kept in a refusals book detailing the time, date, and the goods the person
serving refuses and the name of the persons who tried to purchase. If no name
is given, then a good description will be recorded. This documentation should be available for
inspection on request by an authorised officer of the Licensing Authority or a
Constable.
9.
Any person working in
the premises and concerned with the sale of alcohol is to be trained with
respect to underage sales and in how to refuse sales to difficult customers.
All such training to be updated on an annual basis. Safeguarding training
should also be undertaken with all staff. Such training shall be updated as
necessary when legislation changes.
Training should be clearly documented, signed and dated by both the
trainer and the person receiving it. This documentation should be available for
inspection on request by an authorised officer of the Licensing Authority or a
Constable.
10.
Disorderly customers
will be asked to leave the premises.
11. The volume of
licensable amplified/unamplified live and recorded regulated entertainment must
be at a level so as not to cause a nuisance at the nearest residential
property.
12. Except for access and egress all doors and windows shall be kept closed
during periods of licensable entertainment associated with the Premises
Licence.
13. The manager, licence holder or other competent person shall carry out
observations at the boundary perimeter of the licensed area during the periods
of licensable amplified/ un-amplified recorded entertainment at intervals
during the carrying on of such licensable entertainment, in order to establish
whether there is a noise breakout from the premises. If the observation reveals
noise breakout at a level likely to cause disturbance to the occupants of
properties in the vicinity then the volume of music shall be reduced to a level
that does not cause disturbance.
A record of such observations shall be kept in a
book for that purpose, such a book shall be completed immediately after the
observation detailing the time, location and duration of the observation, the
level of noise breakout and any action taken to reduce noise breakout. Such book to be made available at all times
upon request to an authorised officer of the Licensing Authority or a
constable.
14. No speakers for the amplification of licensable live or recorded music
shall be placed on the outside of the premises or on the outside of any
building forming a part of the premises.
15. The premises shall be cleared of customers within 30 minutes of the last
supply of alcohol on any day.
16. Outdoor lighting shall be positioned, so far as is reasonably
practicable, so as to limit its intrusion into residential accommodation in the
vicinity of the licensed premises whilst maintaining an adequate level of
lighting for the safe access and egress of customers and persons employed at
the premises.
Supporting documents:
- Report-Pontymister Welfare Bowls Club, item 3. PDF 350 KB
- Appendix 1, item 3. PDF 483 KB
- Appendix 2, item 3. PDF 234 KB
- Appendix 3, item 3. PDF 563 KB
- Appendix 4, item 3. PDF 418 KB
- Appendix 5, item 3. PDF 386 KB
- Appendix 6, item 3. PDF 124 KB
- Appendix 7, item 3. PDF 282 KB
- Appendix 8, item 3. PDF 281 KB
- Appendix 8a, item 3. PDF 506 KB
- Appendix 9, item 3. PDF 482 KB
- Appendix 10, item 3. PDF 295 KB
- Appendix 11, item 3. PDF 374 KB
- Appendix 12, item 3. PDF 396 KB
- Appendix 13, item 3. PDF 394 KB
- Appendix 14, item 3. PDF 197 KB
- Appendix 15, item 3. PDF 118 KB